Benefactor or Beneficiary? Wednesday, Aug 18 2010 

 While praying through my stewardship responsibilities and opportunities, my immediate question is, “What is my perspective when I give to the Lord through His church? Am I a benefactor to His Church or am I a beneficiary of God’s gifts from which I am now responding in love, appreciation and anticipation of what He, my Benefactor, will do with what I, a beneficiary, returns to Him?” Every “good gift” has been given to me from the one true and living God by His greatest gift, His “indescribable gift,” Jesus Christ. So, God’s Word creates a significant shift from my normal perspective to giving.

 According to God’s Word, I am not a benefactor who is graciously giving to God through His Church. I am a beneficiary who is responding to my gracious Benefactor, the God of Glory, who has given me what I give in praise to Him and far more. He has given His Son to save me from my sins. I needed Him but did not want Him. He wanted me but did not need me. An extraordinary gift, which I desperately needed but stubbornly did not want. He has given me a treasury of “good gifts” – His Holy Spirit, His Word, spiritual gifts, life-changing experiences and even financial resources.

 So, as I am praying about my response, I am not a proprietor of my things. I am a steward of His things. I am not a benefactor to His Church. I am a beneficiary responding out of love giving from the gift treasury which my Benefactor has bestowed. All because He has given His Son to make me His child and  my good Father who has given me “good gifts” is allowing me to honor Him by giving.

 If I was saved by my religion I might consider what God could ask of me. But I have been saved by His grace so there is nothing my Benefactor cannot ask of me and there is nothing that I withhold from Him.  

 James 1:17

The Good, the Beautiful and the True Tuesday, Aug 10 2010 

 One thing have I asked of the Lord that will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, to gaze upon the beauty of the Lord and to inquire in his temple. Psalm 27:4

I believe that I shall look upon the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living! Psalm 27:13

 “I’m not saying that it is bad or evil, it’s just not the best choice for you.” 

“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”

“Look, there is no such thing as absolute truth.”

“You have your truth and I have my truth.”

 If one stops and thinks through the above statements it does not take long to realize that they are patently absurd! All three of these concepts dominate the way our culture thinks about goodness, beauty and truth. These three concepts have been placed before our minds and hearts this month and all three are undermined in our culture, most of the time perverted and at best are minimized. The way that this has been accomplished is very simple. We are preoccupied with ourselves and self-absorption, self-actualization and self-esteem have become the trinity of life where we give all of our affection and adoration. We have now become the abettors of goodness, beauty and truth. We all claim that there is no true truth only “our truth” which may or may not be “your truth” and I certainly should not expect “true truth.” There is no objective beauty but all simply a matter of personal taste. Appearance, behavior and conversation have no standard of beauty to which they seek to ascend. It is only a matter of one’s preferences and desires at the moment. Certainly nothing is intrinsically good…it may be permissible to assign goodness out of personal preferences but unless something is politically incorrect, it cannot be identified as good or bad. It can only declared as preferred.

 The Word of God clearly challenges our attempt to relativize truth, beauty and goodness first by declaring the word itself true, beautiful and good. Then, by revealing them as attributes of the Triune God. Truth is a reality because God is Truth and cannot lie. Therefore, what God says and does not contain truth or become truth but it IS the truth. For instance in His Word (John 17:17), the Bible does not claim to be a compendium of truthful observations but a revelation of a singular phenomena – truth. Sanctify them in the truth. Thy Word is truth.

 Beauty does not claim to be a product dependent upon the evaluation of an onlooker. In other words, beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, it is the Lord who is Beautiful. He is the God of Beauty. In Psalm 27:4, my favorite Psalm, David declares a single prayer – “that he might dwell in the house of the Lord forever” not simply to be in His presence but specifically “to behold the beauty of the Lord.” A beholder may or may not gaze upon beauty and may or may not have the ability to appreciate beauty but one thing is clear – the beholder does not make beauty, God is Beauty. It is one of His attributes and therefore what He says and does will be beautiful. The questions for us are simple yet profound in its implications. Do we have the God-given ability to see the beauty of the Lord, affirm that beauty and then use His beauty to rejoice in the Lord for His own glory?  

 Concerning goodness – Do we long to embrace the Goodness of the Lord? Not the flimsy imposter in our society which is determined by the collective assent of what is permissible behavior in a narcissistic society nor what is fashionably in vogue as a passing fad for the society. The Lord is Good. In the same Psalm, the hope of David is not only that his despair would flee in the “presence of the Lord” and that he would gaze upon the “beauty of the Lord” but also that he would yet “see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living.”

 So here are two wonderful facts for every Christian. First, truth, beauty and goodness are living realities because they are the attributes of God thus they surround us because God does and says what He is. His Word reveals Himself and therefore what is True, what is Beautiful and what is Good. At the same time it warns as to the reality and perversity of the lie, of the ugly and the evil. He brings to us that which is True, Beautiful and Good. His warning includes the fact that what we bring from our unassisted hearts is the lie, the ugly and the evil as we suppress the glory of God and exalt ourselves.

 Therefore, truth beauty and goodness are not in our eyes or in our hearts or manufactured by our efforts. Our sinful hearts have destroyed our ability to love truth, to appreciate beauty and to do good.  But, praise the Lord. The God of all grace can be called upon just as David does in Psalm 27. O how he loves to hear us when we come in the Name of our True, Beautiful and Good Savior asking…I want to know your truth, behold your beauty and embrace that which You call good.  

There is a second fact which is the glorious blessing. The God in his grace and glory hears us when we call upon Him by faith and repentance in the Name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. The One who is the true, who is our beautiful and who is good. Our Redeemer, who will deliver us from our sin so that we might not only  behold truth, beauty and goodness but that we will love truth, beauty and goodness because we love Him, the Lord of truth beauty and goodness.

 David desired to continually abide “in the sanctuary of the Lord” so that he would be with the Lord, see His beauty and hear His truth while knowing His goodness. David of course is right. It is in the sanctuary that you meet the Lord who is true, beautiful and good. Praise the Lord that He is the Sanctuary. Now, amazingly, He makes us into His sanctuary. We are the temple of the Lord. We are His sanctuary. So, let’s expand our prayer. O Lord, would you allow me to not only behold the One who is true, beautiful and good but may I adorn the Gospel of my Savior the men and women of this world who look to me may gaze upon the Savior who is at work in me and see Him who is true, beautiful and good. O Lord, make me a sanctuary that others may see the Triune God in me who is true, beautiful and good. s good and by your spirit, through your son and for your glory may they see you for there is none like you. True are you O Lord. Beautiful are you O Savior. Good are you my Rock and my Redeemer.

Thoughts From a Drafted Moderator on the 38th General Assembly of the PCA Wednesday, Aug 4 2010 

 This past month I was given the extraordinary honor and privilege to serve the Presbyterian Church in America as Moderator of our General Assembly in Nashville, June 29-July 2. Needless to say, the task was daunting as well as challenging. Our General Assembly, besides usual business, tackled a highly debated initiative which had been making its way through the committees of the denomination called the PCA Strategic Plan. The purpose of the plan is to address issues of proper funding for our Administrative Committee as well as to give vision for the future as the church fulfills its Biblical mission from God’s Word, specifically the Great Commission. As Moderator , it was my responsibility to guide the (at times intense and often tedious) process of debate as well as commissions requests, competence and parliamentary procedures of motions and amendments. My lack of confidence was probably evident on numerous occasions but was greatly ameliorated by the able assistance of the Stated Clerk of the PCA, Dr. Roy Taylor and the appointed parliamentarians, Ruling Elders John White and Sam Duncan as well as a complement of assistant clerks. Their experience, abilities and servant hearts allowed me to not only do what I was called to do but they enabled me to do it much more effectively than I would have ever been able to do which is further evidence to me of the wisdom of our Lord with the marvelous blessing of diversity in callings and gifts throughout the body of Christ.

I have determined, since my responsibility as moderator continues through the entire year, not to comment upon the merits or demerits of the PCA Strategic Plan in order to remain in an appropriate position if needed for future occasions that might necessitate the role of the moderator.

What I would like to do is comment on the conduct of the GA in general and a few observations in particular. As moderator, not only was I positioned for such observations but of necessity was continually engaged and therefore became impressionable to a number of dynamics.

 1. Mission and Vision  – First of all was the obvious desire of those in the General Assembly of the PCA to fulfill our original vision which is bound up with the simple yet, I believe, profound  and timeless statement that the PCA be “True to the Scriptures, the Reformed faith, and obedient to the Great Commission of Jesus Christ.” As we were considering this Strategic Plan there seemed to be a heart desire by those in the Assembly to maintain our faithfulness to this historic three-fold vision of the PCA. In the midst of debate and discussion I sensed that no matter where one stood on the issues the constant refrain and prevalent passion was to remain anchored to the simple yet crucial mission and vision of being “true to the Scriptures, the Reformed faith, and obedient to the Great Commission of Jesus Christ.”

2.       Truth -  Even more specifically, there were stated concerns that in the name of relevance, to reach the culture, there was not enough attention being given to those things which give permanence to the effectiveness of the church transcending the contemporary issues of the culture. And there were some who were concerned that in the name of permanence we as a church were not thoughtfully responding to the ever changing dynamics of the contemporary culture therefore, losing relevance and influence.  Yet, what remained clear was the desire of the vast majority of those engaged in debate to be anchored as well as both informed and conformed to the Word of God. In other words, the General Assembly desired to be faithful and fruitful as an overarching banner defining the discussion. Some were concerned that in the name of faithfulness there was not necessary thought to effectiveness. Some thought that in the pursuit of effectiveness there was a possible erosion of principled faithfulness.

 3. LoveAnother observation is that in the midst of the debate which was marked by passion and precision the ever present attitudes and actions of respect and civility along with the judgment of charity continually surfaced throughout the Assembly. To me, from where I stood as Moderator, it was heartening to see brothers who desire to be faithful to God’s Word through the mission of the church and even though they, at times, intensely disagreed over strategy I  honestly observed the prevalence of respect through proper questions and comments, civility in response and attempting to understand the other person’s position.

4.Advice -  When I was informed, a few weeks prior to the assembly that I was going to be nominated it struck me as odd. The reason is because even though I have had the privilege to preach to the General Assembly on a number of occasions, have regularly led seminars and have never missed a General Assembly since my ordination in 1982, I have never spoken on the floor of General Assembly in debate. There are a number of reasons that I haven’t but initially it is because I am convinced of the marvelous proverbial wisdom “that even a fool is thought to be wise if he keeps silent.”  My father taught me years ago that it is impossible to learn while you are talking and believe me I continue to have much to learn. I also realize that unless you are extremely wise and gifted the more you talk the less effective you usually are so you can see the numerous reasons that it was a choice of wisdom for me not to speak on the floor of General Assembly. While there is a time for silence and yes, silence can be golden and it can also be yellow. So, I would not recommend silence because of cowardice or self preservation. But, I do have some advice. There is more than one of us who is guilty of dominating the microphone and making our opinions known more than necessary. The General Assembly of the PCA may seem like a Session meeting but in reality it is not. It may feel like a committee meeting but in reality it is not. If there is something that needs to be said, say it. The General Assembly is always in need of knowing All that it needs to know. But the General Assembly is not in need of knowing all that you know or all that you think you know or even all that you think the General Assembly should know that you know and by the way, if silent, we may be amazed at how much we don’t know, and that someone else will say what we thought needed to be said and perhaps they will say it better than we could have said it. The result is to find out how much we might yet be able to know and learn.

5.Pray – Orthodoxy – believing the right thing, and orthopraxy – doing the right thing is glorious but it is dead when done in the flesh and without the Holy Spirit. So, my desire is that through intercessory prayer we might seek the Lord’s presence and power, through the Holy Spirit, as a denomination.  May God grant us a hatred of relying on the flesh and an unstoppable desire to be filled with His Spirit. When we look to ourselves, may it be with full knowledge of the weakness and trembling and when we look to the Lord, may it be with confidence and desire. Without Him we can “do nothing” but “I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”

 It is my conviction that the PCA has been and is basically on target but we are at a crucial point. We are approaching our 40th year. It is clear from Scripture and church history that arriving at such an age of any Christian church or movement has arrived at a turning point. The 40 – 80 year time-frame seems to be a crucial moment for institutions and movements. Either they maintain their roots and extend their branches to bear more fruit or they begin the process of uprooting their roots in the name of bearing more fruit and begin to lose fruitfulness having abandoned faithfulness. Many of our seminaries, churches and institutions as well as our denomination are at such a crucial moment in the 40 – 80 year season. The issue for us is God’s sovereign grace granting us direction to deal with this season by the God given blessing of Godly, faithful and wise leaders who in turn give effective leadership.

God has granted the PCA influence beyond its numbers and notoriety. Now, what will we do until Christ comes? What do I think? Well, this is more than an abstract consideration as I have the enormous blessing of pastoring Briarwood Presbyterian Church as we celebrate our 50th year.  My desire is that God would allow us to celebrate and learn intentionally from our past, to consecrate and live effectively in the present and passionately look with anticipation to the future. Perhaps, the most crucial element in such generational transition is God-centered, grace saturated, Bible immersed, spirit filled  leadership which knows the blessing of timely timelessness and the joy of God-anchored permanence producing world shaking relevance. 

Desiring to think in Biblical Perspective,

Harry

A Learning Moment from “America’s Pastime” Friday, Jun 11 2010 

One of the many blessings of participating in sports is that they provide a “clinic” for life. One of the curses of participation in sports is that some participants, spectators and perhaps more unfortunately some of the parents of participants think that the “clinic” for life for is life itself. Sports are games that require athletic ability, discipline and competition within boundaries of rules. When we confuse sports as  life then we also lose the opportunity to use it as a training ground for  life. However, sometimes in the midst of a game there is a moment that shines brightly. Last week in the marvelous game of baseball, also called “America’s Pastime” we were privileged to witness such a moment.

His name is Armando Galarraga. He is a pitcher for the Detroit Tigers who has been having a tough season and was actually on the verge of being sent back to the Minors. But last week, he was given a starting assignment and not only pitched a marvelous game but made it all the way to the ninth inning and was only two outs away from the coveted “perfect game.” (There have been very few “perfect games” in baseball but oddly enough there have already been two this year. This is almost like a baseball tsunami!) Galarraga delivered the pitch. The batter hit a groundball to the left side of the infield. It was fielded by the first baseman, who was ready to toss it to Galarraga, as he covered first base just ahead of the runner. This play, like this game up to this point, was worked to perfection, except the umpire. He made an error. Jim Joyce called the runner, who was obviously out, safe. Galarraga’s immediate response was the first of multiple amazing responses to that call that which provided the opportunity for this story and a glorious moment for a life lesson. Galarraga simply smiled. It was a smile that seemingly conveyed, as one sports writer said, a hope that the umpire was right because it sure seemed that he was wrong. The instant replay showed the runner was out and the umpire was indeed wrong. The obligatory and expected anger of the manager, team and crowd descended upon the first base umpire, Jim Joyce. As they surrounded him, the only one absent was Galarraga. Then, during the media onslaught Galarraga refused to react with anger, wrath or accusations. Although the media was clearly attempting to bait him into an angry response of  condemnation of the umpire and speculation as to the bad call which he had made but the simple smile was now followed by a simple statement…”we all make mistakes.” Armando did not resort to threatening a law suit. He made no accusations of prejudice, bias or malevolence… just simply the recognition that “to err is human.”  What an unbelievably refreshing moment but, it didn’t stop there.

When Jim Joyce saw the replay he immediately, with sincere and visible emotion, owned his mistake and declared that “I costs that kid a perfect game.”  Joyce went to Galarraga and asked for forgiveness. Now, whether Galarraga is a Christian or not, I do not know. But I do know, whether by redeeming grace or common grace, he did an act of grace and not only forgave him but then did his best to console the visibly and emotionally distraught umpire.

Yet, this story did not end there either. If it had, was already a glorious moment but, more was to come. Joyce was the first base umpire, so in the rotation for the next day he was to be the home plate umpire. He knew that he could expect nothing but shouts of abuse, anger and jeers from the crowd. The managers of both teams normally bring out the starting lineup cards to the home plate umpire to start the game but this time, the manager of the Tigers, Jim Leyland, sent Galarraga. When the two men met at home plate, they shook hands, Galarraga again smiled a simple smile and Jim Joyce again wept and again Galarraga consoled him. The reconciliation that was personal the day before now became public. The reaction from the crowd was now spontaneous and exuberant cheers and applause. Even baseball fans who paid for a ticket to yell at everyone, particularly umpires, realized that they had witnessed another glorious moment.

Okay, I am a Gospel Preacher so as I watched this, I could not help but wonder… What would happen if Christians, not only acted that graciously to others in general but, intentionally acted that way toward each other?  Is that not why Christ called us to “forgive other as we have been forgiven?”  Would the world react the same way that the baseball fans reacted at this evidence of Christianity if we responded Christianly toward one another in such a matter? Amazement and maybe even     cheers but more importantly they would then have to ask, “…now why do you love so graciously and patiently and who made you to love in that manner?”

Baseball is a just a game but that day it not only taught lessons for life but it taught lessons for what Paul calls “the abundant life.” We live in a broken world. We will have to deal with malicious sin but we must not be malicious in our response. We must overcome evil with good. Here was a young man who had, in his hands, the coveted achievement of “the perfect game.”  It was taken from his hands by an error but he rose above the circumstances and realized that even though he wanted a “perfect game” he lives in an “imperfect world” where errors are made all the time yet he responded graciously and redemptively.

I hope and pray that Galarraga belongs to the Redeemer. I also pray that those who are redeemed will be challenged by this story to live redemptively with grace. When Galarraga responded as he did I immediately desired to know what or who was in his life that caused him to be such a courageous and gracious man. It was no surprise when I found out about his parents and their influence on him from his wife, who in an interview said his response was no surprise to her because, in her words, that is just “who he is.” As I read her interview I remembered a maxim which I had developed to challenge my faltering life – Circumstances do not dictate your character, they reveal it and become the opportunity to refine it. Armando Galarraga’s character was revealed in that circumstance to such a display that I am now challenged to call upon God’s redeeming grace in my life to be in the midst of disappointment a courageous, forgiving and gracious man for Christ.

One final thought…Being from a baseball family of three generations, a number of people asked me after this event if I thought we needed “instant replay” in baseball. My immediate answer is absolutely not! I personally believe that it is good, if not great, when things like this happen in baseball. Why? Because things like this happen in life all the time. If the first baseman had bobbled the ball or threw it away, the game would not have been a “perfect game” because of his error. But, the first baseman fielded the ball well, threw it straight to the target, Galarraga caught it BUT in this case the umpire made the error. In big league baseball there are not just 18 men on the field. There are 22. Whether it was the first baseman or the umpire, it was an error. That means it was not a “perfect game.” But, in this “Imperfect Game” we got to see something much better. We saw a “Perfect Response.”  

We live in an “imperfect world” because of sin in the midst of “imperfect people”      because we are all sinners. But, there is a Redeemer who has overcome our sin and by that same grace Christ will make you an overcomer in a world of sin and errors – The ones you make and the ones others make around you and to you.

My guess is, you can’t name any of those guys who have pitched perfect games unless perhaps you are my age and remember Don Larsen in the Yankee’s victory during the World Series. I’m pretty certain that none of you know who umpired in those games! However, I’m pretty sure that this generation of baseball fans will remember Jim Joyce, the umpire who owned his error and asked for forgiveness as well as Armando Galarraga, a man who was bigger than self promotion and gave forgiveness.  Could we give in life a Gospel driven “perfect response” to the “imperfect world” around us so that those watching would cheer – not us but the One who saved us and changed us from the need to be cheered to living lives that brings cheers of praise and glory to Christ?  That will be a glorious moment.

The Health Care Bill and What Crawled Out From Under the Rock Tuesday, Mar 30 2010 

One of my favorite activities as a kid was to go in the backyard, find a partially embedded rock, turn it over and see what all would crawl out from underneath it. The new health care plan/law has allowed me as a grown up boy to do the same thing theologically and very practically. Let me state clearly that this blog/post is not a political response to this highly definitive law designed to reform/regulate/renovate health care in the United States but I do propose a theological response to what this event has uncovered. In fact, I think three things have crawled out from under the rock and all three have significant implications for the evangelical church in the United States of America.

1. GOVERNMENTAL BLASPHEMY
With no hesitation and little fanfare and most of all with astounding boldness the proponents of the new health care law have declared their intention through this initiative to “establish a new right” for the citizens of the United States of America. Suspend for a moment the debate as to whether health care is, in fact, a right, but hear the unchallenged assertion that the government of the United States has pronounced its assumed power to establish “a right” for its citizens. This would have been unthinkable to our forefathers. Whether evangelical Christians or Deists, or even agnostic, all consented at least by vote that only God can give “rights and liberties.” Furthermore, they agreed that the purpose of government is not to establish rights but to protect the “unalienable rights” given by the Creator. Now, at what point in the cultural mindset of this nation did we make the enormous leap from a government’s responsibility before God to protect the rights He gives to humanity to the previously unthinkable notion that the government assumes the prerogatives of God by establishing the “rights” for humanity? What was once unthinkable is now not only thinkable and therefore acceptable, but through this initiative encoded, by precedent, into the law of the land. The United States government, through its elected officials, has used sovereignty and power over its citizens to usurp the divine prerogative of God by inserting itself as the giver of rights to its citizens instead of acknowledging that rights are an unalienable gift from God alone. Furthermore, our government has jettisoned its rightful role of protecting God given rights in order to assume the blasphemous role of giving rights. In other words, our government has ceased functioning “under God,” and now presumptively functions “as God.”

The implication for the church is unavoidable. This phenomena has revealed the unassailable fact that the evangelical church is no longer “salt and light” in the nation, and no longer communicates God – centered thinking throughout the culture. Yet, that is exactly what is desperately needed today. The evangelical church has revealed itself to be Biblically illiterate and spiritually impotent. We have actually nurtured members who accept such blasphemous thinking through our preoccupation with “how – to sermons,” which have replaced Biblical exposition and thoughtful application. The result is a church which no longer influences the thinking of the nation, but instead is being conformed by the thinking of the nation and amazingly actually supports and participates in its lightly veiled blasphemy. Oh, for pulpits that once again expound the Word of God and for churches that make disciples by “teaching all” that God has commanded.

2. THE NEW MESSIAH
This bill/law uncovers not simply a political problem of a society embracing a “nanny state”/socialism, but more profoundly a spiritual problem of a citizenry which looks to the state as its messiah. In other words, the new confession of faith is, “the state is my life, it determines whether I have life, can give life, and it alone provides for my life and sustains my life.” Therefore with this new confession, I am now called to give myself to the supremacy of the state with mindless allegiance, adoration and affection, since it is my sufficient savior. How does a citizenry with a history of Christian influence embrace a messianic state instead of insisting on a government which stands by Divine authority through the consent of the governed? Simple. This is because the citizenry no longer hears from the evangelical church of a preeminent and sufficient Savior, and a glorious Gospel which powerfully brings men and women to the Lord of life, Jesus Christ. The solution? Ultimately, the solution is not a Tea Party movement but a spiritual Awakening. Such an Awakening will only occur when the church is revived through Christ – centered and Gospel – driven leadership which is obviously in need of a New Reformation. In other words, the leadership of the evangelical church is in need of a New Reformation producing confidence in the Word of God, engagement with intercessory prayer, resulting in a Christ – centered and Gospel – driven revival which alone will initiate a new Great Awakening.

3. SOMETHING MISSING
The health care bill/law uncovered the fact that its passage was assured because it found traction through the reality that many people were facing physical issues of life with seemingly no place to turn. The reason or at least one reason is that the Church of Jesus Christ no longer intentionally engages in Gospel deeds of love, mercy and justice in such a manner that the physical needs of a people are addressed profoundly and purposefully by the love of Christ through the Body of Christ. Therefore, men and women will always default to the State as their hope. Now, clearly, the church is not totally bereft of evangelical obedience and ministries of mercy, and this is no argument for a social Gospel. But, this is a plea that those who are saved by the Gospel of grace respond graciously and sacrificially to the needs of others, so that men and women might not only hear of Christ the Savior, but experience Him in moments of crisis through the members and ministries of the Body of Christ, His Church.

Now, let’s be clear. We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, yet neither grace nor faith is ever alone. Gospel deeds are always downstream from Gospel words, since the works of faith cannot be produced without the reality of faith, and faith comes by “hearing” the Word of Christ. In other words, the statement “preach the Gospel and if necessary use words” attributed to St. Francis of Assisi may be well – meaning, but is theologically and methodologically inaccurate. One is saved by faith, and faith does not come from observing Gospel deeds but from hearing Gospel words. Yet, if the Gospel has come, those who are Christ – centered and Gospel – driven will “love justice, do mercy, and walk humbly with their God.” Once again, out of the evangelical church will pour forth the powerful, life – changing and culture – shaking deeds of love, mercy and justice through sinners saved by grace, revealing a passionate as well as compassionate Church.

In conclusion, I do not know what political responses are going to be made legislatively to this highly controversial health care bill/law, but I do know at least some changes the church needs to make. The evangelical church must AGAIN regain confidence in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, must AGAIN “hold forth the Word of life” and once AGAIN display as well as declare the love of Christ to the heart and lives of men and women.

In Biblical Perspective,

HLR

Why I Signed the Manhattan Declaration Friday, Jan 22 2010 

As some of you may know, I was one of the original signers of the Manhattan Declaration. I have received communication of encouragement and thanksgiving for signing the Manhattan Declaration. I have been asked  questions as to why I signed the declaration when some of my closest friends and colleagues with whom I serve the Lord alongside did not sign. Then, of course, I have received the inevitable charges that by my signing such a document – I have abandoned the faith.

I am grateful for the first two groups from whom I received messages as everyone needs encouragement and well thought out challenges concerning one’s actions as a minister of the Gospel are helpful and instrumental in maintaining accountability. As for the third group, the messages that were sent to me were not well thought out. They were emotionally passionate but not Biblically rational.

So, the following is my answer to them and I hope it contributes to both the proper use of the Manhattan Declaration as well as an encouragement to its ultimate end as a declaration (which is a call to faithfulness to the Gospel in life and ministry looking to its beneficial impact in the culture through the changed life of men and women).

Secondly, a notice to the culture-shapers of the day ~ that as believers we will stand firm to not only proclaim Gospel blessings but to maintain Gospel imperatives in humble reliance upon Divine Grace and the work of the Holy Spirit.

Why I Signed The Manhattan Declaration

I have been requested to respond as to why I signed the Manhattan Declaration in light of the fact that some of my closest friends and colleagues in life and ministry decided that they could not, in good conscience, sign it. I highly respect and love these men but I find myself in disagreement with them so I thought it would be appropriate to outline my reasons:

Most of those who have not signed the Manhattan Declaration did not do so for the same reasons that they did not sign the Evangelicals and Catholics Together document (ECT). This fact becomes significant for a couple of reasons.

  • I did not sign the ECT for the same reason they did not sign it.
  •  I along with others at that time also signed another statement which contained the reasons why I could not in good conscience sign the ECT document.

 Question? If I agreed with them on the ECT and refrained from signing it why would I now not agree with them and therefore along with them refrained from  signing the Manhattan Declaration since their reasoning is the same?   

 Answer. Because the documents are not the same in content or purpose. The Manhattan Declaration, while similar to the ECT in purpose in that it is desirous of eliciting unity of response to the issues of the culture by bringing together elements of the professing Christian community, it’s content and claims are distinctly different.

  •  The Evangelicals and Catholics Together document while purposed to unite professing believers in a focused response to the cultural issues of the day attempted to do so by claiming that we were all in confessional agreement concerning the Doctrine of Justification. The ECT, in light of the cultural battles we were facing ( i.e. Sanctity of Life, Marriage, Sexuality and Religious Liberty), declared that it was important for Evangelicals and Catholics to stand together. I had no problem being a co-belligerent with Roman Catholics in addressing issues of the culture but I could not in good conscience and with integrity declare that we believed the same thing concerning the cornerstone doctrine of the Gospel – Justification by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone nor did I believe it was necessary to declare that were in agreement on the Doctrine of Justification in order to speak to cultural issues with unanimity. This was so important that I, along with others, signed a later document clarifying the differences between Evangelicals and Catholics on the Doctrine of Justification.

 

  •  The Manhattan Declaration is basically a call to Apostles Creed/Nicene Creed confessing Christian churches to face the issues of the day firmly, faithfully and with united urgency. At the same time it also acknowledges that the true answer to cultural transformation is the personal transformation of men and women through the Gospel of Jesus Christ. But it does not attempt to claim that all signatories are in complete agreement of what we believe concerning the Gospel.

 

  • In other words, in the name of promoting unified cultural engagement by Evangelicals and Catholics the ECT was not only a call to action but also an ecclesiastical and confessional document stating that we were in agreement on our understanding of the Gospel in general and the Doctrine of Justification in particular. I believe that was false (and still do) and therefore could not sign that document and instead I signed another document which clarified the theological and confessional differences between Evangelicals and Catholics concerning the Gospel and specifically the Doctrine of Justification. In contrast, the Manhattan Declaration, while being a call to unified Christian action in the engagement of the cultural issues of the day, does not purport to be a confessional or an ecclesiastical statement of theological unity. It is simply a Declaration of the signatories that there are  crucial issues facing us in our culture (namely the sanctity of life, marriage, sexuality and religious liberty) and therefore the urgent need to deal with these even to the point of civil disobedience if necessary (since we must obey God rather than man) while also acknowledging that it is only the Gospel that can transform this culture of death into a culture of life through the life-giving and life-changing power of the Gospel in the lives of men and women. In no place in the Declaration does it purport to be a confessional statement where all of the signatories propose that they are in agreement confessionally nor is it binding upon any of the organizations or churches as an ecclesiastical covenant. On the contrary, beyond the fact that those signing would all own the Apostles Creed and the Nicene Creed confessionally it actually declares and recognizes that we are not necessarily in agreement on numerous theological issues.

 

  • The Manhattan Declaration  is not a formal vow of agreement that the signatories are confessionally agreed on the Gospel or ecclesiology. It is primarily a statement of the crucial issues that must be faced in the culture and in addition that the ultimate answer to the issues of the culture is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. And, the signatories would declare also that we must stand firm with urgency and united perseverance. It is a historical fact in the founding of this country and at other times of crisis that there were numerous similar declarations by Apostles/Nicene Creed churches and confessing believers who at that time agreed on the crucial issues of the day and declared their united desire to respond to them.  The Manhattan Declaration purposely avoids the error of minimizing the theological commitments of our churches as to what we believe is the truth by attempting to present a misrepresentative confessional statement of agreements. Yet it does commit the signatories to the purpose of identifying the issues of the day and a commitment to intentionally and consistently respond to them and that the primacy of the Gospel is the only ultimate and effective answer to these issues. It furthermore states that we will take a Christ-honoring stand in message and manner within the public square on the previously identified issues.

 

  •  If in fact the Manhattan Declaration required an acknowledgment and affirmation of the confessional positions of all who signed or an attempt to claim that the signatories were in agreement theologically or that our understanding of the Gospel is identical then I would not have signed the document as I refused to do so with the ECT.

 In summation through the Manhattan Declaration I have committed along with other Apostles/Nicene Creed signatories to face the issues of the day with clarity, charity and conviction and I have also declared a willingness to work together with other professing Christians on these issues while personally and pastorally leading my congregation in the glorious privilege of Christ-centered and Gospel-driven evangelism and discipleship which alone will transform men and women and that alone will ultimately transform a culture of death from its death-spiral into a culture of life.